The Italian Court of Cassation confirms likelihood of confusion is not a requisite for additional protection of a trade mark wit
Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG, formerly Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 October 2003 * In Case C-408/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hog
![The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home](https://brandit.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Adidas-vs-Browne-image.png)
The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home
![Michael Atkins - Seattle Trademark Lawyer - Oregon Jury Awards $305 Million to Adidas for Payless Shoe Infringement Michael Atkins - Seattle Trademark Lawyer - Oregon Jury Awards $305 Million to Adidas for Payless Shoe Infringement](http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/storage/Adidas%20America%20v.%20Payless%20Shoesource%20-%20Verdict%20Shot3.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1210137297734)